論文寫作的參考文獻:
1.Jordan, J. E., Osborne, R. H., & Buchbinder, R. (2011). Critical appraisal of health literacy indices revealed variable underlying constructs, narrow content and psychometric weaknesses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64, 366-379.
→可參考它整理工具介紹的表格與比較不同衛教測驗的撰寫方法
2. Eigenmann, C. A., Colagiuri, R., Skinner, T. C., & Trevena, L. (2009). Are current psychometric tools suitable for measuring outcomes of diabetes education? Diabet Med, 26, 425-436.
2. Eigenmann, C. A., Colagiuri, R., Skinner, T. C., & Trevena, L. (2009). Are current psychometric tools suitable for measuring outcomes of diabetes education? Diabet Med, 26, 425-436.
→可參考文章的篩選標準與研究進行流程
評析表
Jordan, J. E., Osborne, R. H., & Buchbinder, R. (2011). Critical appraisal of health literacy indices revealed variable underlying constructs, narrow content and psychometric weaknesses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64, 366-379.
評析表
Jordan, J. E., Osborne, R. H., & Buchbinder, R. (2011). Critical appraisal of health literacy indices revealed variable underlying constructs, narrow content and psychometric weaknesses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64, 366-379.
→有完整的心理計量特性驗證的評析項目,而且項目不會過於瑣碎。
另外於工具介紹增加「測驗之適用對象」(一般民眾或專業人員)。
評析表增加測驗之可取得性。
另外於工具介紹增加「測驗之適用對象」(一般民眾或專業人員)。
評析表增加測驗之可取得性。
沒有留言:
張貼留言